Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02692
Original file (BC 2013 02692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02692

	XXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 30 Apr 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on his FA.

He notified the test proctor, after completing the contested FA, that he had a medical issue.  Specifically, while completing the cardio component his hands throbbed and went numb and he thought he was having a heart attack or stroked.  As a result, he stopped running and walked.  However, had he continued running, he would have completed it much faster.  Five days later he was seen by his medical provider, who indicated that he had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. 

In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter from his medical provider, dated 7 May 2013, indicating that he had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing FA score.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5).

On 30 Apr 13, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 36.50, which constituted an “unsatisfactory” assessment. The applicant was credited with the following component scores:  Cardio – 14:42/0.00, Abdominal Circumference – 36.00”/17.00 points, Push-ups – 57/10.00 points, Sit-ups – 53/9.50 points.

A list of the applicant’s last five FA results is as follows: 

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
26 Jul 2013
79.30
Satisfactory
*30 Apr 2013
36.50
Unsatisfactory
12 Oct 2012
81.90
Satisfactory
3 Oct 2012
71.60
Unsatisfactory
15 May 2012
Exempt
Exempt
*Contested FA
 
On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation.”  
________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the FA dated 30 Apr 13 in AFFMS due to the lack of supporting evidence.  

DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program (dated 1 July 201 0) AFGM 2.1 (dated 3 Jan 13), Paragraph 10. "If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) whether they complete the FA or not. Before departing the test location, Airmen must notify the FAC of the presence of an illness/injury." Part a. "If an Airman notifies the FAC of the presence of an illness/injury, the FAC staff (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will not input the scores in AFFMS for the time period specified below. For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe." The applicant did provide an official statement from his medical provider stating there was a medical condition that precludes him from achieving a passing score; however, did not provide an official statement from the Commander invalidating the applicant's FA score.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded that he had a medical condition that precluded him from obtaining an overall satisfactory rating on the contested FA.  While the applicant has provided medical documentation confirming the 30 Apr 13 diagnosis of his condition, he has not met his burden of proving this condition prevented him from successfully completing the contested FA.  In this respect, we note the 4 Apr 13 memorandum from the applicant’s medical provider indicating he had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on his FA. However, the applicant’s submission does not contain any support from his commander requesting the FA be invalidated,  AF Forms 422 exempting him from the contested FA, or the Fitness Screening Questionnaire he was required to complete prior to completing the assessment.  Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request.  However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the FA dated 30 Apr 13, did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02692 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Ms. XXXXXXXX, Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXX, Vice Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXX, Member







The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02692 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 May 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 17 Oct 13,
	            w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 14.




                                   XXXXXXXX
                                   Chair	


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538

    Original file (BC 2013 02538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe;” Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02331

    Original file (BC 2013 02331.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Feb 14, applicant provided a memorandum in rebuttal of AFPC/DPSIM and FAAB memoranda. While we note an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02521

    Original file (BC 2013 02521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Along with his personal statement, the applicant provided a memorandum from his medical provider that validates he had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. On that same memorandum, the applicant’s medical provider indicated he had a “documented medical condition that precluded him/her from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” IAW AFI 36-2905; Atch 1, Para 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04146

    Original file (BC 2013 04146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide any documentation describing the injury and why he could not pass the contested FAs. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.” In accordance with guidance at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03908

    Original file (BC 2013 03908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Nov 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request for relief on the basis that the applicant should not have completed the contested FAs once she became injured; additionally, the applicant did not provide a commander’s invalidation memorandum invalidating contested FAs. For Regular Air Force and AGR, they will enter the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580

    Original file (BC 2013 02580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A list of the applicant’s complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02951

    Original file (BC 2013 02951.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided documentation validating her medical condition including; an AF FM 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; an AF FM 422 Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status; a medical evaluation letter signed by her medical provider; and her Enlisted Performance Evaluation (EPR) with a close-out date of 1 Apr 13, which indicates she “Meets” the fitness standard at the close-out of her report. The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03180

    Original file (BC 2013 03180 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03180 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 15 Aug 12 be removed from his records. The applicant contends that he suffered from a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA and, thus, said FA should be removed from his records. While we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02592

    Original file (BC 2013 02592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    from the Unit CC;” and Atch 1, Para 13 “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.” The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Measurement Rating 2 Aug 2013 82.20 38.00” Satisfactory 15 May 2013 16.50 39.50” Unsatisfactory 6 Nov 2012 83.30 38.50” Satisfactory *24 Oct 2012 0.00 40.00” Unsatisfactory 30 Jul 2012 74.10 39.00” Unsatisfactory *Annotates Contested FA: On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was...